[GIT PULL] ste_dma40 updates for 3.9

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:

> This series of patches only modify the ste_dma40 driver, there are no
> corresponding changes under arch/arm that need to be coordinated or
> considered w.r.t. merge conflicts. I.e. they all seem nicely isolated
> to only the driver.
>
> So is there a specific reason for why these shouldn't just go in
> through the dmaengine tree?

One reason would be if there are DMA bindings to device tree coming
this merge window, as I'm told, and it implicates a lot of platform code
changes on top of this as we adopt to it.

But maybe this will be wholly confined to the DMAengine tree?

Yours,
Linus Walleij