[PATCH 1/1] usb: fsl-mxc-udc: fix build error due to mach/hardware.h
Felipe Balbi
balbi at ti.com
Mon Jan 14 02:50:16 EST 2013
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:12:43AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Balbi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:50:59PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > As I said before, this patch is too big for -rc and is unnecessary
> > considering patch I wrote above. Note that there is no problems in
> > checking if ULPI PHY clk is 60MHz on all arches and, for the workaround,
> > you already have a runtime check.
> >
> Ok, I did not have these facts on my mind. If these are true, the
> cpu_is_xxx() shouldn't be necessary there from the beginning, and we
> can simply remove them then.
>
> > Shawn, it can be broken down into smaller pieces because you can *FIX
> > THE COMPILE BREAKAGE* with a very small patch as above (only issue now
> > is usage of MX32_IO_ADDRESS()).
> >
> The MX35_IO_ADDRESS() also seems unnecessary, since as Peter's patch
> suggested that pdata->regs can be used instead.
pdata->regs is a hack. The 'canonical' way to pass addresses to drivers
is via struct resource.
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130114/c8a56a03/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list