[v2 3/9] ARM: tegra: # of CPU cores detection w/ & w/o HAVE_ARM_SCU
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Fri Jan 11 05:11:34 EST 2013
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 04:54:13PM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 05:58 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com> wrote @ Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100:
> ...
> > With your "[PATCH] ARM: kernel: DT cpu map validity check helper
> > function", my original patch gets as below. I think that the following
> > "smp_detect_ncores()" function may be so generic that it could be
> > moved in some common place than platform?
> >
> > From f5f2a43952ce75fe061b3808b994c3ceb07f1af1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu at nvidia.com>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:25:14 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: tegra: # of CPU cores detection w/ & w/o
> > HAVE_ARM_SCU
> >
> > The method to detect the number of CPU cores on Cortex-A9 MPCore and
> > Cortex-A15 MPCore is different. On Cortex-A9 MPCore we can get this
> > information from the Snoop Control Unit(SCU). On Cortex-A15 MPCore we
> > have to read it from the system coprocessor(CP15), because the SCU on
> > Cortex-A15 MPCore does not have software readable registers. This
> > patch selects the correct method at runtime based on the CPU ID.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c
>
> > +static int __init smp_detect_ncores(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int ncores, mpidr;
> > + u32 l2ctlr;
> > + phys_addr_t pa;
> > +
> > + mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> > + switch (mpidr) {
> > + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15:
> > + asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : "=r" (l2ctlr));
> > + ncores = ((l2ctlr >> 24) & 3) + 1;
> > + break;
> > + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9:
> > + /* Get SCU physical base */
> > + asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (pa));
> > + scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(pa);
> > + ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + pr_warn("Unsupported mpidr\n");
> > + ncores = 1;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ncores;
> > +}
>
> Why not just remove that function...
>
> > /*
> > * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs
> > * which may be present or become present in the system.
> > */
> > static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void)
> > {
> > - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > -
> > - if (ncores > nr_cpu_ids) {
> > - pr_warn("SMP: %u cores greater than maximum (%u), clipping\n",
> > - ncores, nr_cpu_ids);
> > - ncores = nr_cpu_ids;
> > + if (!arm_dt_cpu_map_valid()) {
> > + unsigned int i, ncores;
> > +
> > + ncores = smp_detect_ncores();
>
> And just say "ncores = 1" here?
>
> For Tegra, it's trivial to simply put the patch adding the required DT
> nodes before this patch, and then there's no need for any
> backwards-compatibility, since the nodes are guaranteed to be there.
If you are willing to accept that your code proposal is perfectly fine by me.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list