[PATCH 4/4] gpiolib: add documentation for new gpiod_ API

Alexandre Courbot acourbot at nvidia.com
Tue Jan 8 02:18:55 EST 2013


Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com>
---
 Documentation/gpio.txt | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpio.txt b/Documentation/gpio.txt
index 77a1d11..871ccda 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpio.txt
+++ b/Documentation/gpio.txt
@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ example, a number might be valid but temporarily unused on a given board.
 
 Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is a platform-specific
 implementation issue, as are whether that support can leave "holes" in the space
-of GPIO numbers, and whether new controllers can be added at runtime.  Such issues
+of GPIO numbers, and whether new controllers can be added at runtime.  Such
+issues
 can affect things including whether adjacent GPIO numbers are both valid.
 
 Using GPIOs
@@ -302,7 +303,8 @@ are claimed, three additional calls are defined:
 	 * 'flags', identical to gpio_request() wrt other arguments and
 	 * return value
 	 */
-	int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char *label);
+	int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char
+*label);
 
 	/* request multiple GPIOs in a single call
 	 */
@@ -773,3 +775,91 @@ differences between boards from user space.  This only affects the
 sysfs interface.  Polarity change can be done both before and after
 gpio_export(), and previously enabled poll(2) support for either
 rising or falling edge will be reconfigured to follow this setting.
+
+GPIO descriptor interface
+=========================
+A more secure, alternative GPIO interface is available through GPIOlib. Instead
+of relying on integers (which can easily be forged and used without being
+properly requested) to reference GPIOs, it uses a system of opaque descriptors
+that must be properly obtained and disposed through the common get/put set of
+functions. This ensures that all GPIO descriptors are valid at any time and
+makes it unnecessary to check the validity of a GPIO. Apart from this
+difference, the interface is similar to the integer-based one, excepted that the
+gpio_ prefix is changed to gpiod_.
+
+This interface can be used in conjonction with the integer-based API, however
+new drivers should really try to use the safer descriptor-based interface.
+Drivers using this interface should depend on CONFIG_GPIOLIB being set, as it is
+only available when GPIOlib is compiled in.
+
+Using GPIOs
+-----------
+GPIO consumers should include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> which declares the
+consumer-side GPIO functions. GPIOs are obtained through gpiod_get:
+
+	struct gpio_desc *gpiod_get(struct device *dev,
+				    const char *con_id);
+
+This will return the GPIO descriptor corresponding to the con_id function of
+dev, or an error code in case of error. A devm variant is also available:
+
+	struct gpio_desc *devm_gpiod_get(struct device *dev,
+					 const char *con_id);
+
+GPIO descriptors are disposed using the corresponding put functions:
+
+	void gpiod_put(struct gpio_desc *desc);
+	void devm_gpiod_put(struct device *dev, struct gpio_desc *desc);
+
+A valid descriptor can then be used with one of the gpiod_ functions. Their
+interface is identical to the integer-based API, excepted that they take a GPIO
+descriptor instead of an integer:
+
+	int gpiod_direction_input(struct gpio_desc *desc);
+	int gpiod_direction_output(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value);
+	int gpiod_get_value(struct gpio_desc *desc);
+	void gpiod_set_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value);
+	...
+
+If you need to convert a descriptor to an integer or vice-versa, you can use
+gpio_to_desc or desc_to_gpio:
+
+	struct gpio_desc *gpio_to_desc(unsigned gpio);
+	int desc_to_gpio(const struct gpio_desc *desc);
+
+The same GPIO can be used by both interfaces as long as it has properly been
+acquired by one of them (i.e. using either gpio_request() or gpiod_get()).
+
+Declaring GPIOs
+---------------
+GPIOs can be made available for devices either through board-specific lookup
+tables, or using the device tree.
+
+Board-specific lookup tables match a device name and consumer ID to a GPIO chip
+and GPIO number relative to that chip. They are declared as follows:
+
+	static struct gpio_lookup board_gpio_lookup[] = {
+		GPIO_LOOKUP("tegra-gpio", 28, "backlight.1", "power"),
+	};
+
+	static void __init board_init(void)
+	{
+		...
+		gpiod_add_table(board_gpio_lookup,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(board_gpio_lookup));
+		...
+	}
+
+In the driver side, the following code:
+
+	gpiod_get(dev, "power");
+
+will return the descriptor for GPIO 28 of the "tegra-gpio" chip provided
+strcmp(dev_name(dev), "backlight.1") == 0.
+
+If the device tree is used, then the same "power" GPIO can be declared into the
+device's node as follows:
+
+	power-gpios = <&gpio 28 0>;
+
+Note that gpiod_get() only allows to access the first GPIO specifier.
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
1.8.1




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list