[PATCH 4/4] ALSA: pxa27x: rename pxa27x_assert_ac97()
Igor Grinberg
grinberg at compulab.co.il
Mon Jan 7 04:39:54 EST 2013
On 01/06/13 21:14, Mike Dunn wrote:
> This patch does nothing functionally, it just gives the function a new name and
> modifies the prototype slightly in order to clarify what the function is doing
> (which is not necessarily asserting the reset).
> Some commentary also added.
>
> Tested on a palm treo 680 machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn at newsguy.com>
This patch makes sense, but again raising your concern...
The gpio_direction_output(reset_gpio, 1) should be called after
the change to AF0.
> ---
>
> checkpatch.pl issues a warning for this patch:
> WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files
> but I just want to rename the function.
>
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97-lib.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c
> index eea90fe..896bf94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c
> @@ -53,26 +53,35 @@ static unsigned long ac97_reset_config[] = {
> GPIO95_AC97_nRESET,
> };
>
> -void pxa27x_assert_ac97reset(int reset_gpio, int on)
> +void pxa27x_configure_ac97reset(int reset_mfp, bool to_gpio)
> {
> + /*
> + * This helper function is used to work around a bug in the pxa27x's
> + * ac97 controller during a warm reset. The configuration of the
> + * reset_mfp is changed as follows:
> + * to_gpio == true: configured to generic output gpio and driven high
> + * to_gpio == false: configured to ac97 controller alt fn AC97_nRESET
> + */
> +
> /* set direction and level before switching from ac97 alt fn to gpio */
> - if (on) {
> - int ret = gpio_direction_output(reset_gpio, 1);
> + if (to_gpio == true) {
> + int ret = gpio_direction_output(reset_mfp, 1);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: gpio_direction_output failed: %d\n",
> __func__, ret);
> return;
> }
> }
> - if (reset_gpio == 113)
> - pxa2xx_mfp_config(on ? &ac97_reset_config[0] :
> - &ac97_reset_config[1], 1);
>
> - if (reset_gpio == 95)
> - pxa2xx_mfp_config(on ? &ac97_reset_config[2] :
> - &ac97_reset_config[3], 1);
> + if (reset_mfp == 113)
> + pxa2xx_mfp_config(to_gpio ? &ac97_reset_config[0] :
> + &ac97_reset_config[1], 1);
> +
> + if (reset_mfp == 95)
> + pxa2xx_mfp_config(to_gpio ? &ac97_reset_config[2] :
> + &ac97_reset_config[3], 1);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pxa27x_assert_ac97reset);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pxa27x_configure_ac97reset);
>
> /* Crystal clock: 13MHz */
> #define BASE_CLK 13000000
> diff --git a/sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97-lib.c b/sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97-lib.c
> index 416d2e3..fbac476 100644
> --- a/sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97-lib.c
> +++ b/sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97-lib.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static struct clk *ac97_clk;
> static struct clk *ac97conf_clk;
> static int reset_gpio;
>
> -extern void pxa27x_assert_ac97reset(int reset_gpio, int on);
> +extern void pxa27x_configure_ac97reset(int reset_mfp, bool to_gpio);
>
> /*
> * Beware PXA27x bugs:
> @@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ static inline void pxa_ac97_warm_pxa27x(void)
> gsr_bits = 0;
>
> /* warm reset broken on Bulverde, so manually keep AC97 reset high */
> - pxa27x_assert_ac97reset(reset_gpio, 1);
> + pxa27x_configure_ac97reset(reset_gpio, true);
> udelay(10);
> GCR |= GCR_WARM_RST;
> - pxa27x_assert_ac97reset(reset_gpio, 0);
> + pxa27x_configure_ac97reset(reset_gpio, false);
> udelay(500);
> }
>
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ int pxa2xx_ac97_hw_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> __func__, ret);
> goto err_conf;
> }
> - pxa27x_assert_ac97reset(reset_gpio, 0);
> + pxa27x_configure_ac97reset(reset_gpio, false);
> ac97conf_clk = clk_get(&dev->dev, "AC97CONFCLK");
> if (IS_ERR(ac97conf_clk)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(ac97conf_clk);
--
Regards,
Igor.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list