[PATCH v5 13/22] mfd: omap-usb-host: override number of ports from platform data
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at mvista.com
Thu Jan 3 07:52:32 EST 2013
Hello.
On 02-01-2013 19:00, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Both OMAP4 and 5 exhibit the same revision ID in the REVISION register
> but they have different number of ports i.e. 2 and 3 respectively.
> So we can't rely on REVISION register for number of ports on OMAP5
> and depend on platform data (or device tree) instead.
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> index 5edb828..710460d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> @@ -497,19 +497,27 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
>
> - switch (omap->usbhs_rev) {
> - case OMAP_USBHS_REV1:
> - omap->nports = 3;
> - break;
> - case OMAP_USBHS_REV2:
> - omap->nports = 2;
> - break;
> - default:
> - omap->nports = OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS;
> - dev_dbg(dev,
> - "USB HOST Rev : 0x%d not recognized, assuming %d ports\n",
> - omap->usbhs_rev, omap->nports);
> - break;
> + /*
> + * If platform data contains nports then use that
> + * else make out number of ports from USBHS revision
> + */
> + if (pdata->nports) {
> + omap->nports = pdata->nports;
> + } else {
> + switch (omap->usbhs_rev) {
> + case OMAP_USBHS_REV1:
> + omap->nports = 3;
> + break;
> + case OMAP_USBHS_REV2:
> + omap->nports = 2;
> + break;
> + default:
> + omap->nports = OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS;
> + dev_dbg(dev,
> + "USB HOST Rev:0x%d not recognized, assuming %d ports\n",
Please indent the string to the right somewhat, as it was before.
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list