[PATCH 2/2] arm: make return_address available for ARM_UNWIND
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Jan 3 05:38:15 EST 2013
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:12:29PM +0900, kpark3469 at gmail.com wrote:
> -#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) || defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
> * return_address uses walk_stackframe to do it's work. If both
> * CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y and CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND=y walk_stackframe uses unwind
> - * information. For this to work in the function tracer many functions would
> - * have to be marked with __notrace. So for now just depend on
> - * !CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND.
So what have you done about the issue referred in this comment? Or do you
believe that fixing warnings (even if they are explicit #warning statements)
is far more important than code being functionally correct?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel