[PATCH] arm64: add support for uart earlyprintk
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Thu Feb 28 06:34:17 EST 2013
On 28/02/13 11:01, Anup Patel wrote:
Hi Anup,
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel at apm.com>
A proper patch description would be nice.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c
> index 7e320a2..62953ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/early_printk.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,21 @@ static void __iomem *early_base;
> static void (*printch)(char ch);
>
> /*
> + * UART (8250/16550) single character TX.
> + */
> +static void uart_printch(char ch)
> +{
> +#define UART_LSR 0x14
> +#define UART_TX 0x0
Please use the constants defined in include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h,
together with the proper shifts.
> +
> + while (!(readl_relaxed(early_base + UART_LSR) & 0x20))
> + ;
You may want to test both UART_LSR_TEMT and UART_LSR_THRE here.
> + writeb_relaxed(ch, early_base + UART_TX);
> + while (!(readl_relaxed(early_base + UART_LSR) & 0x20))
> + ;
Why do you have to wait again here? It should be enough to do in only
once when entering the function.
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * PL011 single character TX.
> */
> static void pl011_printch(char ch)
> @@ -47,6 +62,7 @@ struct earlycon_match {
>
> static const struct earlycon_match earlycon_match[] __initconst = {
> { .name = "pl011", .printch = pl011_printch, },
> + { .name = "uart", .printch = uart_printch, },
"uart" is way too generic. pl011 is an UART too, and I suspect most of
the backends that are going to be added here over time will be UARTs.
"uart8250" would be a possibility (and actually consistent with the rest
of the kernel, see drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_early.c.
Cheers,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list