[PATCH] cpufreq: highbank: do not initialize array with a loop
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Sun Feb 24 22:41:18 EST 2013
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Emilio López <emilio at elopez.com.ar> wrote:
> As uninitialized array members will be initialized to zero, we can
> avoid using a for loop by setting a value to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio at elopez.com.ar>
> ---
> Note that I don't own any device using this driver, it has only been compile
> tested, but it shouldn't cause any issues.
>
> drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
> index 66e3a71..30d4ae1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
> @@ -28,13 +28,9 @@
>
> static int hb_voltage_change(unsigned int freq)
> {
> - int i;
> - u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN];
> + u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN] = {HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE};
>
> - msg[0] = HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE;
> msg[1] = freq / 1000000;
I think this can also be part of the definition of array, isn't it?
So it would be something like:
u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN] = {HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE, freq / 1000000};
> - for (i = 2; i < HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN; i++)
> - msg[i] = 0;
>
> return pl320_ipc_transmit(msg);
> }
> --
> 1.8.2.rc0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list