[PATCH 0/8] ARM; OMAP2+: hwmod and SERIAL: Remove sysc handling from driver

Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Wed Feb 20 05:23:22 EST 2013


On Wednesday 20 February 2013 03:44 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:27:44PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> OMAP UART IP needs manual idle modes based on functional state of the
>> IP. Currently this is handled by the driver with function pointers
>> implemented in platform code.
>
> Up until now, the nightly test builds have included a load of test code
> for supporting DMA on OMAP serial - only the buggy transmit side which
> we've covered the reasons earlier why this can't work properly.
>
> We've also covered why the ripping out of the DMA code from the serial
> driver, and then subsequent "cleanup" of the driver has resulted in it
> being impossible to resurect receive DMA support without reverting all
> those cleanups.
>
> This patch set is yet again another nail in the coffin of any DMA support
> in the serial driver; it is removing the final bits of knowledge about
> how DMA support interacts with the idle support.  Arguably, the previous
> cleanups already did that, but at least the hooks were still clearly
> visible as separate stand-alone entities and how only they were affected
> by DMA being enabled.
>
Actually the clean-up will remove the serial driver dependency with
idle handling. Infact DMA support need not care about idle handling
anymore.

> Therefore, tonight I am dropping and discarding what I have left over
> from my work on getting DMA support working with the OMAP serial driver
> again from the nightly test builds and my git tree, and I intend no
> further involvement with this.
>
Please please don't do that. We were at a point where we are unable
to use UART has just simple console with DT without the $subject
series. We can help you if some re-basing is needed for your
patches because of the $subject series.

Sorry for another series getting in between your work but this
one was unavoidable due to already broken support.

Regards,
Santosh






More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list