[PATCH 3/3] driver: net: ethernet: cpsw: dual emac interface implementation
Mugunthan V N
mugunthanvnm at ti.com
Mon Feb 18 10:10:48 EST 2013
On 2/18/2013 7:06 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "M" == Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com> writes:
> M> The CPSW switch can act as Dual EMAC by segregating the switch ports
> M> using VLAN and port VLAN as per the TRM description in
> M> 14.3.2.10.2 Dual Mac Mode
>
> M> Following CPSW components will be common for both the interfaces.
> M> * Interrupt source is common for both eth interfaces
> M> * Interrupt pacing is common for both interfaces
> M> * Hardware statistics is common for all the ports
> M> * CPDMA is common for both eth interface
> M> * CPTS is common for both the interface and it should not be enabled on
> M> both the interface as timestamping information doesn't contain port
> M> information.
>
> M> Constrains
> M> * Reserved VID of One port should not be used in other interface which will
> M> enable switching functionality
> M> * Same VID must not be used in both the interface which will enable switching
> M> functionality
>
> M> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com>
> M> ---
> M> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt | 2 +
> M> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 335 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> M> include/linux/platform_data/cpsw.h | 3 +
> M> 3 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> M> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> M> index 6ddd028..ecfdf75 100644
> M> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> M> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> M> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ Required properties:
> M> Optional properties:
> M> - ti,hwmods : Must be "cpgmac0"
> M> - no_bd_ram : Must be 0 or 1
> M> +- dual_emac : Specifies Switch to act as Dual EMAC
> M> +- dual_emac_res_vlan : Specifies VID to be used to segregate the ports
>
> You forgot to CC devicetree-discuss. Properties normally use dashes (-)
> instead of underscores (_). These properties are more about
> configuration and not hardware.
>
> It is not clear to me from the description that dual_emac is a boolean
> (0/1). Shouldn't dual_emacs_res_vlan be a property of the slave?
>
> It would also be good to update the example below with this.
Since the series is already applied in net-next tree, i will submit a
patch with incorporating
the above comments. Will add devicetree-discuss in my future patches.
Regards
Mugunthan V N
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list