[PATCH] pinctrl: gpio: vt8500: Add pin control driver for Wondermedia SoCs
Linus Walleij
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Fri Feb 15 15:27:06 EST 2013
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Tony Prisk <linux at prisktech.co.nz> wrote:
Hm some of these remarks would apply to the BCM2835 driver as
well, I missed to complain at the time it was added. Probably I was
all too excited about the new Raspberry.
Mainly you want Stephens review on this since he wrote the
driver you based it on...
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1618,10 +1618,10 @@ config LOCAL_TIMERS
> config ARCH_NR_GPIO
> int
> default 1024 if ARCH_SHMOBILE || ARCH_TEGRA
> + default 512 if SOC_OMAP5
> default 355 if ARCH_U8500
> + default 352 if ARCH_VT8500
> default 264 if MACH_H4700
> - default 512 if SOC_OMAP5
> - default 288 if ARCH_VT8500
> default 0
This seems like a totally unrelated chunk, put that in some
other patch and send off to the ARM SoC people if you want
it changed.
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_WMT) += pinctrl-wmt.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_WM8850) += pinctrl-wm8850.o
So one front-end driver and one pluggable SoC-driver
I guess.
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-wm8850.c
(skipping this file, looks like OK and pure data)
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-wmt.c
(...)
> +#define WMT_PINCONF_PACK(__param, __arg) ((__param << 16) | __arg)
> +#define WMT_PINCONF_UNPACK_PARAM(__conf) (__conf >> 16)
> +#define WMT_PINCONF_UNPACK_ARG(__conf) (__conf & 0xffff)
Please use the generic pinconf helper library, there are no magic
configurations in this driver. Look at other drivers using generic pinconf
and get pack/unpack for free and tested.
(then follows a large block of nice, clean code)
> +static int wmt_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin,
> + unsigned long config)
> +{
> + struct wmt_pinctrl_data *data = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> + enum wmt_pinconf_param param = WMT_PINCONF_UNPACK_PARAM(config);
> + u16 arg = WMT_PINCONF_UNPACK_ARG(config);
> + u32 bank = pin >> 5;
> + u32 bit = pin & 0x1f;
Comment the two lines above. What kind of magic is happening?
I can guess, but it's better if it's stated.
(...)
> +static int wmt_gpio_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> +{
> + struct wmt_pinctrl_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(chip->dev);
> + u32 bank = offset >> 5;
> + u32 bit = offset & 0x1f;
Hm it looks like duplicated code as well. What abot a small
static inline helper function to do the magic?
> +int wmt_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct wmt_pinctrl_data *data)
> +{
> + int err;
> + wmt_desc.pins = data->pins;
> + wmt_desc.npins = data->npins;
> +
> + data->gpio_chip = wmt_gpio_chip;
> + data->gpio_chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> + data->gpio_chip.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + data->gpio_chip.ngpio = data->nbanks * 32;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> +
> + data->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + data->pctl_dev = pinctrl_register(&wmt_desc, &pdev->dev, data);
> + if (IS_ERR(data->pctl_dev)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register pinctrl\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + err = gpiochip_add(&data->gpio_chip);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not add GPIO chip\n");
> + return err;
> + }
Nice with gpiochip and pinctrl in the same probe, just as
it should be.
> +
> + data->gpio_range = wmt_pinctrl_gpio_range;
> +
> + data->gpio_range.gc = &data->gpio_chip;
> + data->gpio_range.base = data->gpio_chip.base;
> + data->gpio_range.npins = data->nbanks * 32;
> + pinctrl_add_gpio_range(data->pctl_dev, &data->gpio_range);
Don't do this. Register ranges from the gpiochip side instead
of from the pinctrl side of things. This way of doing things is
deprecated.
Grep for gpiochip_add_pin_range for examples.
When you have this right I guess you could probably
patch the BCM driver as well since it's so similar.
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Pin controller initialized\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
(...)
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-wmt.h
Looks OK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list