[PATCH 10/17] ARM: update atag-to-fdt code to be endian agnostic

[Ben Dooks]

On 14/02/13 04:43, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Ben Dooks wrote:
>
>> On 12/02/13 21:53, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/02/13 12:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:17:40PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>>>>> -	if (atag->hdr.tag != ATAG_CORE ||
>>>>>> -	    (atag->hdr.size != tag_size(tag_core)&&
>>>>>> -	     atag->hdr.size != 2))
>>>>>> +	if (atag->hdr.tag != atag32_to_cpu(ATAG_CORE) ||
>>>>>> +	    (atag->hdr.size != atag32_to_cpu(tag_size(tag_core))&&
>>>>>> +	     atag->hdr.size != atag32_to_cpu(2)))
>>>>>
>>>>> This is wrong.  You're saying that "ATAG_CORE" is in LE32 format.  It
>>>>> isn't.  It's in CPU endian format.  If you want to do this kind of
>>>>> thing,
>>>>> you also need to define cpu_to_atag32() macros as well, otherwise this
>>>>> will cause sparse warnings.
>>>>>
>>>>>> -			initrd_start = atag->u.initrd.start;
>>>>>> -			initrd_size = atag->u.initrd.size;
>>>>>> +			initrd_start =
>>>>>> atag32_to_cpu(atag->u.initrd.start);
>>>>>> +			initrd_size =
>>>>>> atag32_to_cpu(____atag->u.initrd.size);
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did those four underscores come from?  Has this been built?
>>>>
>>>> I probably missed building this one. I've been mostly testing with DT
>>>> based systems.
>>>
>>> Is this BE8 mode available on old systems?  Or, will those BE8
>>> capable old systems have BE userland compiled for them?
>>
>> BE8 is for ARMv6 and ARMv7 form of big endian. ARMv5 is BE32.
>
> I think that by now all ARMv6+ targets should be DT enabled.  So you
> shouldn't have to care about ATAGs at all.
>
>>> Where I want to get to is: do we need to support BE8 mode for ATAG based
>>> systems at all, given that most if not all the modern ones should be DT
>>> based now?  Making the ATAG code BE8 aware is looking to be quite
>>> invasive for potentially no users at all.
>>
>> The change is only useful when using a BE8 compiled kernel with a
>> boot loader environment that is LE.
>
> That's what CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT is for.  So only that code would
> need to swap the ATAG data.
>
>> Even if the ATAGs do not need
>> fixing up, then we have a issue with uboot checking the zImage magic.
>
> I gave you a patch for that.
>
>> I have pushed the ATAGs issues to a new series as it is not necessary
>> for the current work we are doing with highbank primarily.
>
> I don't think it is needed at all given that BE8 is available mainly on
> targets supporting DT, and is likely to be used on targets that do
> support only DT.

Some devices we have still only have ATAG booting in u-boot, so it i
possible that it may have to stick around to allow the fdt to be updated
with any extra command line stuff...


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius