[v2 3/3] ARM: tegra: Unify Device tree board files
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Mon Feb 11 18:54:03 EST 2013
On 02/10/2013 11:05 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Unify board-dt-tegra{30,114} to the Tegra20 DT board file, "tegra.c".
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile
> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += cpu-tegra.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_PCI) += pcie.o
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC) += tegra.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC) += board-dt-tegra30.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC) += board-dt-tegra114.o
> +obj-y += tegra.o
> +
I think I'd be tempted to move that line together with all the others
that don't depend on some config option.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> -static struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
> +static struct of_dev_auxdata tegra_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5000000, "tegra-ehci.0",
> &tegra_ehci1_pdata),
> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5004000, "tegra-ehci.1",
> &tegra_ehci2_pdata),
> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5008000, "tegra-ehci.2",
> &tegra_ehci3_pdata),
> +#endif
> {}
> };
Why ifdef? This is certainly small enough that it shouldn't matter for
any Tegra30- or Tegra114-kernel, and it's hopefully going away very
soon, so I'd prefer to drop the addition of the ifdefs to avoid any
conflicts with any other changes to that table.
> static void __init trimslice_init(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_PCI
> int ret;
>
> ret = tegra_pcie_init(true, true);
> if (ret)
> pr_err("tegra_pci_init() failed: %d\n", ret);
> -#endif
> }
>
> static void __init harmony_init(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_PCI
> int ret;
>
> ret = harmony_pcie_init();
> if (ret)
> pr_err("harmony_pcie_init() failed: %d\n", ret);
> -#endif
> }
Why drop those ifdefs? Does the code still compile (link) if built for
Tegra30-only or Tegra114-only, where the Tegra PCI driver won't be
enabled, and hence those functions don't exist?
> static void __init paz00_init(void)
> @@ -129,6 +128,9 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_late(void)
>
> tegra_init_late();
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC))
> + return;
I don't think that's going to help any link issues, so I'd drop it and
keep this function simple. After all, what if someone wants to add some
non-PCI-related entry into board_init_funcs[]?
> -static const char *tegra20_dt_board_compat[] = {
> +static const char * const tegra_dt_board_compat[] = {
> "nvidia,tegra20",
> + "nvidia,tegra30",
> + "nvidia,tegra114",
> NULL
> };
It'd be best to add the newer values first. It shouldn't matter, but
currently does at least for device compatible matching, so we may as
well be consistent here.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list