Latest additional build warnings

[Olof Johansson]

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> * Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> [130209 19:08]:
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
>> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> [130209 03:53]:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:22:18PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:60:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
>> >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:60:1: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'omap_postcore_initcall'
>> >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:60:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
>> >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:31:122: warning: 'hwspinlocks_init' defined but not used
>> >>
>> >> I'm still seeing the above in the build of Friday's merge.  I'm also
>> >> seeing additional warnings in the randconfig similar to the above for
>> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-iommu.c.
>> >
>> > Thanks for letting me know about the omap-iommu.c one. Looks like
>> > there's also one patch for drm.c.
>> >
>> > Olof, if you did not yet apply the hwspinlock.c warning fix, I'll
>> > just do a branch with all three of them for you.
>>
>> I haven't (must have missed it), so please just send a branch.
>
> OK will do. Probably you started fixing up the bad Reported-by
> line in my patch and then got disrupted :)
>
> Found one more after some grepping, after the following patch they
> should be all fixed up. Pull request coming shortly.

Oh wait -- I got confused there for a bit (this came in right as I had
to step out for a while).

I definitely picked up the hwspinlock patch, and it's there in my
local for-next. Looks like I missed pushing it out though. That
explains why Russell didn't see the fix. :(


So, the hwspinlock patch is already applied. The soc.h one is not, and
I'm not sure what the third one is?


-Olof