[PATCH v2 19/27] pci: PCIe driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP systems

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:51:28PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> > So you'd end up with a MMU mapping something like:
> >   PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE    MBUS_IO_PHYS_BASE
> >     0->4k          => 0      -> 4k             // 4k assigned to link0
> >     4k->8k         => 64k+4k -> 64k+8k         // 4k assigned to link1
> >     8k->24k        => 128k+8k -> 128k+24k      // 8k assigned to link2
> 
> I am not sure to understand your example, starting at the second line.
> Shouldn't the second line have been
> 
>       4k->8k         => 64k -> 64k+4k

No..
 
> as you suggested, then when the device driver will do an inl(0x4) on
> this device, the device will receive the equivalent of an inl(0x1004),
> no?

Link 0 translates like:

- Linux driver does inl(0x4)
- ARM layer converts that into a read from PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE + 0x4
- The CPU TLB converts that into a read from CPU physical
  0xc0000000 + 0x4
- The MBUS window remap register converts that into a read from IO
  space 0x4
- The address 0x4 is placed in the PCI-E IO transaction of link 0

Link 1 translates like:

- Linux driver does inl(0x1004)
- ARM layer converts that into a read from PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE + 0x1004
- The CPU TLB converts that into a read from CPU physical
  0xc0000000 + 0x11004 (ie the mbus window for the link 1)
- The MBUS window remap register converts that into a read from IO
  space 0x1004
- The address 0x1004 is placed in the PCI-E IO transaction of link 1

Noting that in both instances the IO address passed to inl is what
eventually appears on the PCI-E link after all the translation is
completed.

The CPU MMU is being used used to route 4k aligned ranges to the
correct link.

> I understand that I have two choices here:
> 
>  * First one is to make the I/O regions of all PCIe links fit below the
>    default IO_SPACE_LIMIT (0xffff) by doing the mapping trick you
>    described above.
> 
>  * Second one is to have one 64 KB block for each PCIe link, which
>    would require raising the IO_SPACE_LIMIT on this platform.

Yes, however, AFIAK this is the environment you should be running in:

#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT  ((resource_size_t)0xfffff)

Which is 5 f's not 4.

> > Though, there is still a problem with the MMIO mbus window
> > alignment. mbus windows are aligned to a multiple of their size, PCI
> > MMIO bridge windows are always aligned to 1M...
> 
> Can't this be solved using the window_alignement() hook we've been
> discussing separately? Just like we teach the Linux PCI core about our
> alignment requirements of 64K for the I/O regions, we could teach it
> about our alignment requirement on memory regions as well. No?

Hopefully :) As long as it can adjust the start and length you should
be fine.

Jason