[PATCH v4] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_pte for unaligned addresses

[R Sricharan]

On Wednesday 06 February 2013 05:45 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:44:19AM +0000, R Sricharan wrote:
>> On Monday 04 February 2013 10:10 AM, R Sricharan wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>>>> index 9f06102..47154f3 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>>>> @@ -581,34 +581,36 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t
>>>> *pud, unsigned long addr,
>>>>                          const struct mem_type *type)
>>>>    {
>>>>        pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>>>> +    unsigned long next;
>>>>
>>>> -    /*
>>>> -     * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be aligned
>>>> -     * to a section boundary.  Note that PMDs refer to the individual
>>>> -     * L1 entries, whereas PGDs refer to a group of L1 entries making
>>>> -     * up one logical pointer to an L2 table.
>>>> -     */
>>>> -    if (type->prot_sect && ((addr | end | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
>>>> -        pmd_t *p = pmd;
>>>> +    do {
>>>> +        next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
>>>> +
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * Try a section mapping - next, addr and phys must all be
>>>> +         * aligned to a section boundary.  Note that PMDs refer to the
>>>> +         * individual L1 entries, whereas PGDs refer to a group of L1
>>>> +         * entries making up one logical pointer to an L2 table.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        if (((addr | next | phys) & ~SECTION_MASK) == 0) {
>>>> +            pmd_t *p = pmd;
>>>>
>>>      There is a  need to do page mappings even when all the addresses
>>>      are aligned. This was added with CMA, which required the initial
>>>      mappings to be set with 2 level tables.
>>>
>>      Sorry, i wanted to ask type->prot_sect is removed here and is that
>>     intentional?
>
> No, I just forgot about it.
>
>>     I did a similar kind of patch in my V1 [1].
>>      I should be using PMD_MASK instead of SECTION_MASK there, and
>>     updated it in the next version.
>>
>>      [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1272991/
>
> With regards to your current patch, I really don't think looping over
> pmd in alloc_init_pte() is the right fix. The alloc_init_pte() function
> gets a pmd argument and it is supposed to make it point to a pte and
> populate that pte rather than populate a number of pmds.
>
> create_mapping() loops over pgds. alloc_init_pud() loops over puds
> (well, we don't have any but we have the function for consistency).
> alloc_init_section() should loop over pmds (we can even change the name
> to alloc_init_pmd()).
>
> Your original patch from August was better as it kept the looping
> consistent but as you said, it should be using pmd_addr_end(). We can
> use something simpler like alloc_init_pmd() on arm64 and instead of
> set_pmd() there just call a separate map_init_section() which for
> 2-levels it sets both entries. This may address Russell's comment that
> the resulting code was ugly.
  Thanks. So just to understand, you mean alloc_init_pmd loops over
  map_init_section. map_init_section populates either one pmd
  or calls alloc_init_pte. correct ? . I can send a v5 for this.
>
> The problem with the classic MMU is that if we have a 1MB range we can
> end up with just page mappings. The code is currently buggy since if we
> have create_mapping() for a 1MB range and later create_mapping() for a
> 4KB in the next MB, the first 1MB is removed.
>
  Ok, so in that case we will have a BUG_ON(pmd_bad) right?
  Earlier we had this hit when both static and page mappings
  were attempted in the same 2MB range and understood it was wrong.

Regards,
  Sricharan