[PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add GPMC controller
Florian Vaussard
florian.vaussard at epfl.ch
Tue Feb 5 12:23:15 EST 2013
Hi Javier,
On 02/04/2013 12:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[...]
>
> Yes, I saw on the list that Tony asked you too extend the GPMC DT
> support. Flash support is on my TODO list too but I don't know if I'm
> going to have time to work on this in the next few weeks.
>
> Since you are thinking to change the binding, there is something I
> want to discuss with you.
>
> We have two different version for each IGEP board, one that uses NAND
> memory and another that has OneNAND.
>
> With board files this is easy because the flash memory type is
> hardcoded (in hardware) using sysboot pins [3]. So we check the
> sysboot value and call board_nand_init() or board_onenand_init()
> accordingly and pass the same static struct mtd_partition
> igep_flash_partitions[] in both cases.
>
> But with DT this is a little bit trickier since you have to define
> either a nand at 0 or onenand at 0 child node for the gpmc device node. So,
> we will have to create lots of dts and dtsi to handle each combination
> (IGEPv2 + NAND, IGEPv2 + OneNAND, IGEP COM + NAND, etc).
>
> I wonder if we could just have a generic gpmc-flash binding and maybe
> use a "gpmc, flash_type" property or something like that to decide if
> gpmc_onenand_init() or gpmc_nand_init() has to be called.
>
This boils down to the problem where you have an "if" statement in
your board file, and I think no general solution exists.
In your suggestion, having a property will force you anyway to write
distinct DT files to account for the two versions, so it won't really
help if I understand correctly. We would need conditional
section inside device trees, at least to test for simple parameters.
Or a way to generate several DT blobs based on a single DT source file.
Another hackish solution would be to write a meta component, whose
probe section would do your test. But this is just a stripped down version
of the board file, far from being generic...
I will think on it during my holidays :)
Regards,
Florian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list