[PATCH v9 3/7] ARM: dts: enable hi4511 with device tree

[Kevin Hilman]

Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org> writes:

> On 30 August 2013 02:13, Kevin Hilman <khilman at linaro.org> wrote:
>> Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> Enable Hisilicon Hi4511 development platform with device tree support.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
>>
>> This still doesn't look quite right...
>>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile        |    1 +
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620-clk.dtsi | 1058 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620.dtsi     |  513 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/hi4511.dts      |  648 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 2220 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620-clk.dtsi
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620.dtsi
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/hi4511.dts
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>>> index 641b3c9..6e7c1ca 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos4210-origen.dtb \
>>>       exynos5250-snow.dtb \
>>>       exynos5420-smdk5420.dtb \
>>>       exynos5440-ssdk5440.dtb
>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HI3xxx) += hi4511.dtb
>>>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIGHBANK) += highbank.dtb \
>>>       ecx-2000.dtb
>>>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_INTEGRATOR) += integratorap.dtb \
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620-clk.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620-clk.dtsi
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..78307c6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hi3620-clk.dtsi
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1058 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Hisilicon Ltd. Hi3620 SoC
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012-2013 Hisilicon Ltd.
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012-2013 Linaro Ltd.
>>> + *
>>> + * Author: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>>> + * publishhed by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> +     clocks {
>>> +             #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +             #size-cells = <1>;
>>> +             ranges;
>>> +
>>> +             osc32k: osc32k {
>>> +                     compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> +                     #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> +                     clock-frequency = <32768>;
>>> +                     clock-output-names = "osc32khz";
>>> +             };
>>
>> So you've now moved these all under the clocks node, but this still
>> isn't addressing Stephen's comments about using the
>> node-name at unit-address and the reg property in each node.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +             sysctrl: system-controller at fc802000 {
>>> +                     compatible = "hisilicon,sysctrl";
>>> +                     reg = <0xfc802000 0x1000>;
>>> +                     #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +                     #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Why is sysctrl and all of its children now under the clocks node?
>>
>>
>> Kevin
>
> SMP registers and clock registers are sharing the system controller.

That suggest the clock node should be a child of the sysctrl node, not
the other way around.

Kevin