[Query] CPUFreq: Does these machines have separate clock domains for CPUs?

Magnus Damm magnus.damm at gmail.com
Fri Aug 30 02:48:28 EDT 2013

Hi Viresh,

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
> So, that we can use some generic routines for these drivers which
> would eventually do:
> cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
> And I wanted to make sure that this doesn't break them.. :)
> ......
> The drivers are:
> drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c

The above SH cpufreq driver seems to be written with SMP in mind, but
I would say SMP is a very rare case for SH. So I believe it can be
considered as UP-only at this point. If Paul disagrees I'm quite sure
he will tell us.


/ magnus

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list