[PATCH v4 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: VDD CORE OPP50 support

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:47:04AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:

> > So this is done from cpuidle rather than system suspend.

> It is done for system suspend. It isn't possible to do this in a
> cpuidle use case as the memory controller would need to come out of
> idle automatically to service DMA requests.

OK, so it's all part of the core power down sequence for the SoC?  I'm
not sure that makes a big difference but it at least means that there
are fewer runtime interactions to worry about.

> > I mean describe the intended sequence of events in the system rather
> > than the raw register commands to accomplish them.

> I'm still not sure what you mean.

Say "set voltage X" or even "regulator X supplies Y" not "send this
bytestream to the device".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130829/047e1eca/attachment.sig>