[PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Add s5pv210 support to pinctrl-exynos

Mateusz Krawczuk m.krawczuk at partner.samsung.com
Tue Aug 27 08:58:39 EDT 2013


On 08/27/2013 02:22 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Mateusz,
>
> Is this a series of 4 patches? Apparently I have received only this one.
No, I send wrong version of this patch,  other patches are completely 
unrelated to this one.
>
> On Tuesday 27 of August 2013 11:19:31 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
>> This patch implements pinctrl for s5pv210 and adds required device tree
>> bindings.
> This should be wrapped to have lines shorter than 80 characters.
Ok, I'll correct this.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk at partner.samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig           |  2 +-
>>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c  | 58
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c |  3 +-
>>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h |  1 +
>>   4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>> index bdb1a87..ffe4b49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ config PINCTRL_SAMSUNG
>>
>>   config PINCTRL_EXYNOS
>>   	bool "Pinctrl driver data for Samsung EXYNOS SoCs other than 5440"
>> -	depends on OF && GPIOLIB && ARCH_EXYNOS
>> +	depends on OF && GPIOLIB && (ARCH_EXYNOS || ARCH_S5PV210)
>>   	select PINCTRL_SAMSUNG
>>
>>   config PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c index a74b3cb..fc3e1d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> @@ -660,6 +660,64 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_resume(struct
>> samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata) exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(drvdata,
>> bank);
>>   }
>>
>> +/* pin banks of s5pv210 pin-controller */
>> +static struct samsung_pin_bank s5pv210_pin_banks0[] = {
> nit: No need for the 0 suffix in the name above, as it's the only pin
> controller on S5PV210.
I renamed to s5pv210_pin_banks.
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x020, "gpa1", 0x04),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x040, "gpb", 0x08),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x060, "gpc0", 0x0c),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x080, "gpc1", 0x10),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x0A0, "gpd0", 0x14),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x0C0, "gpd1", 0x18),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x0E0, "gpe0", 0x1c),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x100, "gpe1", 0x20),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x120, "gpf0", 0x24),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x140, "gpf1", 0x28),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x160, "gpf2", 0x2c),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x180, "gpf3", 0x30),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x1A0, "gpg0", 0x34),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x1C0, "gpg1", 0x38),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x1E0, "gpg2", 0x3c),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x200, "gpg3", 0x40),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(7, 0x220, "gpgi"),
> typo: According to the manual, this bank is called GPI.
Ok, fixed
>
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x240, "gpj0", 0x44),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x260, "gpj1", 0x48),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x280, "gpj2", 0x4c),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x2A0, "gpj3", 0x50),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x2C0, "gpj4", 0x54),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x2E0, "mp01"),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(4, 0x300, "mp02"),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x320, "mp03"),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x340, "mp04"),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x360, "mp05"),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x300, "mp06"),
> typo: According to the manual, MP05 bank is supposed to be located at offet
> 0x380...
Ok, fixed.
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x320, "mp07"),
> ...and this one at 0x3a0.
>
> Also, what about MP1x and MP2x banks?
MP1x and MP2x are DRAM1 and DRAM2 ports so in/out ports are not used.
>
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC00, "gph0", 0x00),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC20, "gph1", 0x04),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC40, "gph2", 0x08),
>> +	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC60, "gph3", 0x0c),
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct samsung_pin_ctrl s5pv210_pin_ctrl[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		/* pin-controller instance 0 data */
>> +		.pin_banks	= s5pv210_pin_banks0,
>> +		.nr_banks	= ARRAY_SIZE(s5pv210_pin_banks0),
>> +		.geint_con	= EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET,
>> +		.geint_mask	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET,
>> +		.geint_pend	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EPEND_OFFSET,
>> +		.weint_con	= EXYNOS_WKUP_ECON_OFFSET,
>> +		.weint_mask	= EXYNOS_WKUP_EMASK_OFFSET,
>> +		.weint_pend	= EXYNOS_WKUP_EPEND_OFFSET,
>> +		.svc		= EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET,
>> +		.eint_gpio_init = exynos_eint_gpio_init,
>> +		.eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init,
>> +		.suspend	= exynos_pinctrl_suspend,
>> +		.resume		= exynos_pinctrl_resume,
>> +		.label		= "s5pv210-gpio-ctrl0",
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>>   /* pin banks of exynos4210 pin-controller 0 */
>>   static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos4210_pin_banks0[] = {
>>   	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00),
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index 439f2ef..f14b379 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> @@ -878,7 +878,6 @@ static struct samsung_pin_ctrl
>> *samsung_pinctrl_get_soc_data( }
>>   	match = of_match_node(samsung_pinctrl_dt_match, node);
>>   	ctrl = (struct samsung_pin_ctrl *)match->data + id;
>> -
> This change shouldn't belong to this patch.
Ok, I removed this .
>
>>   	bank = ctrl->pin_banks;
>>   	for (i = 0; i < ctrl->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) {
>>   		spin_lock_init(&bank->slock);
>> @@ -1113,6 +1112,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = { .data = (void *)exynos5250_pin_ctrl },
>>   	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pinctrl",
>>   		.data = (void *)exynos5420_pin_ctrl },
>> +	{ .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-pinctrl",
>> +		.data = (void *)s5pv210_pin_ctrl },
>>   #endif
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_S3C64XX
>>   	{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c64xx-pinctrl",
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h index 11bb75b..30622d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h
>> @@ -260,5 +260,6 @@ extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2412_pin_ctrl[];
>>   extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2416_pin_ctrl[];
>>   extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2440_pin_ctrl[];
>>   extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2450_pin_ctrl[];
>> +extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s5pv210_pin_ctrl[];
>>
>>   #endif /* __PINCTRL_SAMSUNG_H */
> You should also extend pinctrl-samsung device tree binding documentation[1]
> to mention about S5PV210 as well.
>
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
>
I will add in v2.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list