[PATCH v8 1/7] irqchip: vic: Parse interrupt and resume masks from device tree

Stephen Warren swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Fri Aug 23 19:19:50 EDT 2013


On 08/23/2013 05:04 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Friday 23 of August 2013 16:11:18 Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/22/2013 05:22 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> This patch extends vic_of_init to parse valid interrupt sources
>>> and resume sources masks from device tree.
>>>
>>> If mask values are not specified in device tree, all sources
>>> are assumed to be valid, as before this patch.
>>
>> Can you explain further why the VIC needs this information up-front?
>> Presumably it can accumulate it as devices request interrupts.
> 
> It does not need this information just for operation, but this makes the 
> hardware description more detailed and allows better sanity checking of 
> interrupts being requested.

Ah, OK. It may be worth mentioning the intent of the properties. I
suppose this is purely a representation of HW then, so it's reasonable
to include it in the binding. I'm not sure /quite/ how useful it is;
after all the error-checking that it enables will never trigger assuming
the rest of the DT is written to "request" the correct interrupts.
However, I guess there is little harm in allowing these properties.

Bikeshedding a bit, but perhaps rename wakeup-mask to valid-wakeup-mask
(and perhaps valid-mask to valid-source-mask for consistency, although I
see you already renamed that to be consistent with other bindings...)?
To me, wakeup-mask sounds like a configuration of which sources should
be configured to wakeup the system; something to do with
configuration/policy rather than HW capabilities.

Either way, the binding,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>

(I assume those 2 new properties always have 1 cell since the controller
can only support up to 32 IRQ sources? If not, then perhaps add wording
to describe how long the properties should be).



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list