[RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence
boris brezillon
b.brezillon at overkiz.com
Thu Aug 22 09:05:48 EDT 2013
Hello Florian,
Thanks for your answer.
On 22/08/2013 14:43, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Boris,
>
> 2013/8/22 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon at overkiz.com>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch is a proposal to support the register/unregister/register
>> sequence on a given mdio bus.
>>
>> I use the register/unregister/register sequence to add a fallback when the
>> of_mdiobus_register (this function calls mdiobus_register with phy_mask
>> set to ~0) does not register any phy device (because the device tree does
>> not define any phy).
>> In this case I call mdiobus_unregister and then call mdiobus_register with
>> a phy_mask set to 0 to trigger a full mdio bus scan.
>>
>> I'm not sure this is the right way to do it (this is why I added RFC in the
>> subject).
>>
>> Could someone help me figuring out what I should use to implement my fallback ?
>>
>> 1) use the register/unregister/register sequence
>> 2) reimplement the "for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++)" mdiobus_scan loop
> I think solution 2 is nicer, in that case, would it be enough in your
> case to export a function called mdiobus_scan()? You could call at a
> time you know PHY devices have a chance of having been probed?
mdiobus_scan is already exported:
struct phy_device *mdiobus_scan(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr);
This function scans the presence of a phy device at a given address.
What I need is a loop which scan all the possible address on the given
mdio bus:
struct phy_device *mdiobus_full_scan(struct mii_bus *bus)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) {
if ((bus->phy_mask & (1 << i)) == 0) {
struct phy_device *phydev;
phydev = mdiobus_scan(bus, i);
if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
err = PTR_ERR(phydev);
goto error;
}
}
}
return 0;
error:
while (--i >= 0) {
if (bus->phy_map[i])
device_unregister(&bus->phy_map[i]->dev);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mdiobus_full_scan);
Since I am the only one who need this kind of functionnality right now,
I'm not sure
this is a good idea to export a new function.
This behaviour may be implemented in the of_mdiobus_register function:
when no dt phy node are found in the mdio bus dt node, we could launch a
full
scan.
What do you think ?
Best Regards,
Boris
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list