[PATCH 00/10] ARM: clps711x: Initial DT support / Fixes

[Olof Johansson]

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 08:32:30AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:29:00 -0700
> Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:54:42AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:34:51 +0400
> > > Alexander Shiyan <shc_work at mail.ru> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Here is next patchset for the Cirrus Logic CLPS711X target CPUs.
> > > > The first four patches is a small fixes. The rest is a attempt
> > > > to add DT support for this subarch.
> > > > As long as DT support is incomplete (no peripherals), I did not
> > > > add DTS yet. This is the next step.
> > > > 
> > > > Alexander Shiyan (10):
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Remove the special name for the syscon driver
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Drop fortunet board support
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: autcpu12: Remove incorrect config checking
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: edb7211: Remove extra iotable_init() call
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X clk driver
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X clocksource driver
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X irqchip driver
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Add CLPS711X cpuidle driver
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Migrate CLPS711X subarch to the new basic drivers
> > > >   ARM: clps711x: Add initial DT support
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > If there is no objection about "fixes" part of patchset,
> > > can these parts (1/10-4/10) be applied?
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > Definitely, I'll apply them to fixes-non-critical for 3.12.
> > 
> > Btw, Kevin Hilman is stepping in to help out with arm-soc maintenance, so
> > please email arm at kenrel.org, since it's an alias that we are all on.
> > 
> > Also, I don't know if I've asked this of you before, but for these "smaller"
> > platforms that don't see quite so much activity, it's easy for us to forget who
> > wants us to apply patches and who stages branches. So emails like these are
> > appreciated so we know if you want them applied, or if we'll get a pull request
> > later. Clarifying in the patch posting if they are for review or for applying
> > works too.
> 
> Do you mean always create CC to "arm at ..." for parts [0/xx] or after review period?
> Thnaks.

Hi,

arm at kernel.org for when you want them applied. I try to avoid getting
too many patches posted there just for review, it's the alias we try
to keep mostly for platform maintainers to email us pull requests and
patches to apply to.

You can cc us on our individual addresses if you want for the reviews. We might
not always respond in a timely manner depending on how backlogged we are on
email, so remind us if needed.


-Olof