[PATCH v7 10/11] ARM: hi3xxx: add clk-hi3716
zhangfei gao
zhangfei.gao at gmail.com
Wed Aug 21 21:19:33 EDT 2013
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Haojian Zhuang (2013-08-19 19:31:12)
>> From: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at linaro.org>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Mingjun <zhang.mingjun at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> +static int hi3716_clkgate_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct hi3716_clk *clk = to_clk_hi3716(hw);
>> + unsigned long flags = 0;
>> + u32 reg;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + reg = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
>> + reg &= ~BIT(clk->reset_bit);
>> + writel_relaxed(reg, clk->reg);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hi3716_clkgate_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct hi3716_clk *clk = to_clk_hi3716(hw);
>> + unsigned long flags = 0;
>> + u32 reg;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + reg = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
>> + reg |= BIT(clk->reset_bit);
>> + writel_relaxed(reg, clk->reg);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct clk_ops hi3716_clkgate_ops = {
>> + .prepare = hi3716_clkgate_prepare,
>> + .unprepare = hi3716_clkgate_unprepare,
>> +};
>
> Why .prepare & .unprepare instead of .enable & .disable?
>
> Regards,
> Mike
Thanks Mike for the review
the .enable & .disable is directly use clk_gate_ops.
+ hi3716_clkgate_ops.enable = clk_gate_ops.enable;
+ hi3716_clkgate_ops.disable = clk_gate_ops.disable;
+ hi3716_clkgate_ops.is_enabled = clk_gate_ops.is_enabled;
+ p_clk->gate.bit_idx = array[1];
prepare & unprepare is handle reset bit, while enable & disable is
handle enable bit.
We have to extend since clk_gate_ops does not consider prepare &
unprepare, otherwise it would be simpler.
Thanks
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list