[PATCH v4 3/4] dma: mmp_pdma: add support for residue reporting
Xiang Wang
wangx at marvell.com
Wed Aug 21 07:35:29 EDT 2013
On 08/17/2013 01:05 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> In order to report the channel's residue, we walk the list of running
> descriptors, look for those which match the cookie, and then try to find
> the descriptor which defines upper and lower boundaries that embrace the
> current transport pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c b/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
Hi, Daniel
One thing I want to check with you and all:
If we have these descriptors in the running chain:
D1T1 -> D2T1 -> D3T1 => D1T2 -> D2T2 -> D3T2
| Transaction 1 | Transaction 2 |
And DMA currently running to D2T1, if we provide the cookie of D3T2,
what the residual value we should get? All unfinished bytes in T1+T2 or
only unfinished bytes in T2 (seems not easy to implement)?
> index 0be99a6..b29b581 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
> #define DALGN 0x00a0
> #define DINT 0x00f0
> #define DDADR 0x0200
> -#define DSADR 0x0204
> -#define DTADR 0x0208
> +#define DSADR(n) (0x0204 + ((n) << 4))
> +#define DTADR(n) (0x0208 + ((n) << 4))
> #define DCMD 0x020c
>
> #define DCSR_RUN (1 << 31) /* Run Bit (read / write) */
> @@ -759,6 +759,78 @@ static int mmp_pdma_control(struct dma_chan *dchan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int mmp_pdma_residue(struct mmp_pdma_chan *chan,
> + dma_cookie_t cookie)
> +{
> + struct mmp_pdma_desc_sw *sw;
> + u32 curr, residue = 0;
> + bool passed = false;
> + bool cyclic = chan->cyclic_first != NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the channel does not have a phy pointer anymore, it has already
> + * been completed. Therefore, its residue is 0.
> + */
> + if (!chan->phy)
> + return 0;
From my point of view, there is one concern:
If we want to use the End-of-Receive Interrupt (EORIRQEN in DCSR), when
an interrupt comes, usually it doesn't mean there is no bytes left.
We talked about this in this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1500713
I posted a patch some time ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1510435
There were some comments suggested by Vinod.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Xiang
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list