[PATCH] i2c: imx: use exact SoC revision document binding

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:42:37PM +0800, Jingchang Lu wrote:
> use exact SoC revision instead of wildcard describing
> the compatible property requirement in the binding
> document. This will make the binding more clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu <b35083 at freescale.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.txt | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.txt
> index 3614242..4e7282d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
>  * Freescale Inter IC (I2C) and High Speed Inter IC (HS-I2C) for i.MX
>  
>  Required properties:
> -- compatible : Should be "fsl,<chip>-i2c"
> +- compatible :
> +  - "fsl,imx1-i2c" for I2C used similar to that on i.MX1 SoC

Would it be any better to word it like "for I2C compatible with the one
integrated on i.MX1 SoC".

Shawn

> +  - "fsl,imx21-i2c" for I2C used similar to that on i.MX21 SoC
> +  - "fsl,vf610-i2c" for I2C used similar to that on Vybrid vf610 SoC
>  - reg : Should contain I2C/HS-I2C registers location and length
>  - interrupts : Should contain I2C/HS-I2C interrupt
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.0
> 
>