linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc tree
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Mon Aug 19 16:57:36 EDT 2013
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:05:37PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the mvebu tree got conflicts in various files
> between merges and commits in the arm-soc tree and merges in the mvebu
> tree.
I'm afraid I'm a bit lost...
> These merges/commits in the mvebu tree appear to be from a previous
> version of the arm-soc tree that the mvebu tree has been rebased upon.
> Please don't do that - the arm-soc tree as a whole is not stable.
I didn't do anything different from the other times I built for-next.
Could you give me a specific example when you build linux-next again?
I'll certainly try to avoid it in the future, but it'll be easier if I
know what 'it' is. ;-)
I'll not change for-next today, and we'll see how it goes.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list