[PATCH v3 7/8] ARM: dts: omap4: update omap-control-usb nodes
Roger Quadros
rogerq at ti.com
Mon Aug 19 03:24:58 EDT 2013
Hi Benoit,
On 08/16/2013 05:30 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> Sorry I missed something in the previous revision :-(
no problem :)
>
> On 16/08/2013 15:09, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Split otghs_ctrl and USB2 PHY power down into separate
>> omap-control-usb nodes. Get rid of "ti,type" property.
>
> You should add that you update the usb_otg_hs node accordingly as well.
OK.
>
>> CC: Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>> index 22d9f2b..a77dd0a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
>> usb2_phy: usb2phy at 4a0ad080 {
>> compatible = "ti,omap-usb2";
>> reg = <0x4a0ad080 0x58>;
>> - ctrl-module = <&omap_control_usb>;
>> + ctrl-module = <&omap_control_usb2phy>;
>> };
>> };
>>
>> @@ -643,12 +643,16 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> - omap_control_usb: omap-control-usb at 4a002300 {
>> - compatible = "ti,omap-control-usb";
>> - reg = <0x4a002300 0x4>,
>> - <0x4a00233c 0x4>;
>> - reg-names = "control_dev_conf", "otghs_control";
>> - ti,type = <1>;
>> + omap_control_usb2phy: omap-control-usb at 4a002300 {
>> + compatible = "ti,usb2-control-usb";
>> + reg = <0x4a002300 0x4>;
>> + reg-names = "power";
>> + };
>> +
>> + omap_control_usbotg: omap-control-usb at 4a00233c {
>> + compatible = "ti,omap4-control-usb";
>> + reg = <0x4a00233c 0x4>;
>> + reg-names = "otghs_control";
>> };
>>
>> usb_otg_hs: usb_otg_hs at 4a0ab000 {
>> @@ -661,7 +665,7 @@
>> multipoint = <1>;
>> num-eps = <16>;
>> ram-bits = <12>;
>> - ti,has-mailbox;
>> + ctrl-module = <&omap_control_usbotg>;
>
> In omap-usb.txt, ti,has-mailbox is still marked as mandatory whereas the ctrl-module is optional.
>
> You should update the usb-otg-hs bindings as well.
Right, I removed it from the binding information, but missed the example.
>
> BTW, why is that property not prefixed with "ti,"? Is ctrl-module really meaningful for other arch?
The ctrl-module thing is TI specific, but otg_hs is used by other platforms, maybe that's why
the "ti," prefix was used.
cheers,
-roger
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list