[PATCH V2 01/35] cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine

[Viresh Kumar]

On 19 August 2013 11:46, amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel at samsung.com> wrote:
> I meant that something like 2 policies can be registered SCALE_DIRECT/STEPS.
> if SCALE_DIRECT is registered than target will be called with exact
> frequency. SCALE_STEPS will behave as currently happening. This way
> target_index api may not be needed. But looks like Rafael and others
> are fine with your approach so you can ignore this :)


 Why wouldn't we need target_index in case of SCALE_DIRECT? All
target_index is doing now is changing platform specific registers to configure
an exact frequency reported by index..