[PATCH v4 5/6] clocksource: armada-370-xp: Fix device-tree binding

[Tomasz Figa]

On Monday 19 of August 2013 01:33:18 Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/17/2013 06:43 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:29:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > 
> > In fact: I'm not sure. I'm slightly inclined towards considering both
> > clocks as clock sources, just as Stephen and Tomasz are proposing.
> > 
> >> But in the end, passing it by DT should be the way to go. I cannot
> >> look
> >> into the XP datasheet, but I would guess that the exact feature of
> >> the
> >> ip is not to use _the_ fixed 25MHz clock but XTAL as reference. Maybe
> >> one of the free-electrons guys can look it up?
> > 
> > No, the documentation has a register bit for "25Mhz frequency enable",
> > for each timer/watchdog.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Anyway, I (almost) agree that the 25Mhz fixed clock must be somehow
> > represented in the device-tree, but I'm not exactly sure how.
> > Gregory: maybe you can help in this?
> 
> In armada-370-xp.dtsi add a 25MHz ref clock node and modify timer node
> to reference it:
> 
> cpus { ... };
> 
> clocks {
> 	ref25M: timer-clock {
> 		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> 		clock-frequency = <25000000>;
> 	};
> }
> 
> ...
> 
> internal-regs {
> 	timer at 20300 {
> 		compatible = "marvell,armada-370-xp-timer";
> 		reg = <0x20300 0x30>, <0x21040 0x30>;
> 		interrupts = <37>, <38>, <39>, <40>, <5>, <6>;
> 		clocks = <&coreclk 2>, <&ref25M>;
> 		clock-names = "fabric", "fixed";

These names look more like SoC-level clock names, not clock input names of 
the IP. Are they referenced by such names in documentation?

> 	};
> };
> 
> Then use of_clk_get_by_name(np, "fabric") and of_clk_get_by_name(np,
> "fixed") respectively. Clock select strategy should be, (a) fail if
> no clock, (b) use fabric/fixed if just one clock, (c) use fixed if
> both clocks.

This basically sounds good, except those names.

Best regards,
Tomasz