[PATCH v2 1/8] usb: phy: omap-control: Get rid of platform data

[Roger Quadros]

Hi Sebastian,

On 08/15/2013 07:22 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Roger Quadros | 2013-08-15 16:15:05 [+0300]:
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> index a4dda8e..3b9ee83 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> @@ -197,8 +197,13 @@ static int omap_control_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> 	struct resource	*res;
>> 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> -	struct omap_control_usb_platform_data *pdata =
>> -			dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> +	if (np) {
>> +		of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,type", &control_usb->type);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* We only support DT boot */
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
> 
> what about
>     if (!nop)
>         return -EINVAL;

OK, I can change it to -EINVAL.

> 
>> 	control_usb = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*control_usb),
>> 		GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -207,15 +212,6 @@ static int omap_control_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> 		return -ENOMEM;
>> 	}
>>
>> -	if (np) {
>> -		of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,type", &control_usb->type);
> 
> and here you shift the property to the left and remove the other lines.
> But then you wanted to remove that ti,type thingy but I guess this will
> be part of another patch then. Since you can't do everything in one
> patch, it is okay.

I've actually moved the ti,type stuff on the top. So there is no functional change
other than getting rid of platform data.

> 
>> -	} else if (pdata) {
>> -		control_usb->type = pdata->type;
>> -	} else {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no pdata present\n");
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -	}
>> -
>> 	control_usb->dev	= &pdev->dev;
>>
>> 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> 

cheers,
-roger