Broken device trees for exynos in linux-next
Kukjin Kim
kgene at kernel.org
Thu Aug 15 20:04:28 EDT 2013
Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> Kukjin,
>
Hi, Olof,
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:34 AM, <build at lixom.net> wrote:
>
> > exynos5440_defconfig:
> > ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> >
> > exynos_defconfig:
> > ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
>
> Full error is:
>
> DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dtb
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "pdma1"
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "pdma1"
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "pdma0"
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "pdma0"
>
> Looks like you have broken device trees in linux next.
(+ Mark)
NO, the build breakage is due to commit 6187288f15bc ("ARM: dts: exynos5250:
move common i2s properties to exynos5 dtsi" which is in Mark Brown's tree.
Mark, pleaser revert it in your tree...
> Also, what is exynos5440_defconfig?
(+ Arnd)
I think, maybe we discussed about that? :) current exynos_defconfig cannot
support exynos5440 because of LPAE and I remember we decided LPAE and
non-LPAE should be separated. So as I commented before, exynos5440_defconfig
is needed. If you have any concerns, please let me know.
> Don't add contents (which includes defconfigs)
> to linux-next branches that won't make it all the way upstream.
>
Sure :)
Thanks,
Kukjin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list