[PATCH 02/10] crypto: omap-aes: Add useful debug macros
Joel Fernandes
joelf at ti.com
Wed Aug 14 19:40:29 EDT 2013
On 08/14/2013 06:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 18:12 -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> When DEBUG is enabled, these macros can be used to print variables
>> in integer and hex format, and clearly display which registers,
>> offsets and values are being read/written , including printing the
>> names of the offsets and their values.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c
> []
>> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
>>
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +#define prn(num) printk(#num "=%d\n", num)
>> +#define prx(num) printk(#num "=%x\n", num)
>
> pr_debug?
Sure, can change that.
>> +#else
>> +#define prn(num) do { } while (0)
>> +#define prx(num) do { } while (0)
>> +#endif
> []
>> @@ -172,13 +180,35 @@ struct omap_aes_dev {
>> static LIST_HEAD(dev_list);
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(list_lock);
>>
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +#define omap_aes_read(dd, offset) \
>> + do { \
>> + omap_aes_read_1(dd, offset); \
>> + pr_debug("omap_aes_read(" #offset ")\n"); \
>> + } while (0)
>> +
>> +static inline u32 omap_aes_read_1(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset)
>> +#else
>> static inline u32 omap_aes_read(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset)
>> +#endif
>> {
>> return __raw_readl(dd->io_base + offset);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +#define omap_aes_write(dd, offset, value) \
>> + do { \
>> + pr_debug("omap_aes_write(" #offset "=%x) value=%d\n", \
>> + offset, value); \
>> + omap_aes_write_1(dd, offset, value); \
>> + } while (0)
>> +
>> +static inline void omap_aes_write_1(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset,
>> + u32 value)
>> +#else
>> static inline void omap_aes_write(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset,
>> u32 value)
>> +#endif
>> {
>> __raw_writel(value, dd->io_base + offset);
>> }
>
> Umm, yuck?
>
> Is there any real value in read_1 and write_1?
Can you be more descriptive? There is a lot of value in them for debug
to show clearly sequence of read/writes. Moreover, they are no-op'd when
DEBUG is disabled.
Other than the obvious use, I guess it could be rewritten to be bit
cleaner. I can do that.
-Joel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list