[PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: cleanups for 3.13
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at sisk.pl
Tue Aug 13 16:01:17 EDT 2013
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 07:01:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael/Russell,
> These patches would be part of this patchset finally, sending it separately as I
> didn't wanted to send other patches in that series..
> (Above series was rebased over https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263 and hence this
> patchset too)..
> These first exposes frequency table and then uses cpufreq generic routines
> (which uses exposed table) instead of its own .verify() routine.
> Later I will send another patch that would be part of this series:
> (I need to send that series again today and so not sending that patch twice,
> once here and then in that series)..
> All these patches are pushed here with all dependencies:
Are the three patches in this series prerequisite for the big target_index
one? If so, I think they can go into 3.12 actually, if they are ACKed by the
appropriate platform maintainers.
> Viresh Kumar (3):
> cpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table
> cpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields
> cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.c | 65 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.h | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 9 +++---
> drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 9 +++---
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel