[PATCH v3 0/6] Armada 370/XP clocksource fixes

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 08/13/2013 04:05 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:28:41PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 09:16 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> This small patchset fixes a somewhat minor issue found in the clocksource
>>> driver for Armada 370/XP SoC.
>>>
>>> On one side the Armada 370 SoC has no 25 MHz fixed timer.
>>> On the other side the Armada XP SoC cannot work properly without such 25 MHz
>>> fixed timer selected, because otherwise the base clock frequency would vary
>>> when doing cpufreq frequency changes.
>>>
>>> Therefore we can consider the SoCs as not being compatible, being better to
>>> have two compatible strings, one for each SoC. The previous compatible and
>>> its behavior has been removed, considering there are no DT-enabled boards
>>> in use in the field.
>>>
>>> In addition, CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE is used to simplify the initialization.
>>>
>>> This patchset is based on v3.11-rc4. Also, to ease maintainer's task this
>>> is based on these two patches which are in linux-next:
>>>
>>>   commit be14114934545f52be2ffddbe401ba0951007c59
>>>   Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
>>>   "clocksource: time-armada-370-xp: Divorce from local timer API"
>>>
>>>   commit 4047c794ae18c467a5ea987265238186bc253f61
>>>   Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
>>>   "clocksource: time-armada-370-xp: Fix sparse warning"
>>
>> Your patchset does not apply to my tree for timers/core
>>
>> These two patches described above are in the ARM tree, not available in
>> the timers/core tree.
>>
>> The correct submission path for these would have been through timers/urgent:
>>
>> timers/urgent -> v3.11-rcX -> arm-soc
>>                            -> timers/core
>>
>> Or alternatively if it depends on material in arm-soc, a pull request
>> based in a v3.11-rcX where Olof and I can pull from.
>>
>> I guess you have to rebase your patchset on top of timers/core.
>>
> 
> Sure. I'll just send this patchset on top of timers/core.

Ok, thx.

> I guess it was just a silly thing to base this on top of those
> two patches.
> 
> Thanks,
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog