[PATCH v1 04/14] clk: Add set_rate_and_parent() op
James Hogan
james.hogan at imgtec.com
Fri Aug 9 05:11:56 EDT 2013
Hi Stephen,
On 25/07/13 01:43, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Some of Qualcomm's clocks can change their parent and rate at the
> same time with a single register write. Add support for this
> hardware to the common clock framework by adding a new
> set_rate_and_parent() op. When the clock framework determines
> that both the parent and the rate are going to change during
> clk_set_rate() it will call the .set_rate_and_parent() op if
> available and fall back to calling .set_parent() followed by
> .set_rate() otherwise.
>
> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan at imgtec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
Aside from the nit below, I can't see anything wrong with this patch.
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan at imgtec.com>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 484f8ad..1f7eabb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,18 @@ struct clk_hw;
> * which is likely helpful for most .set_rate implementation.
> * Returns 0 on success, -EERROR otherwise.
> *
> + * @set_rate_and_parent: Change the rate and the parent of this clock. The
> + * requested rate is specified by the second argument, which
> + * should typically be the return of .round_rate call. The
> + * third argument gives the parent rate which is likely helpful
> + * for most .set_rate_and_parent implementation. The fourth
> + * argument gives the parent index. It is optional (and
nit: s/It/This callback/ or add newline or something - I completely
misread it the first time, thinking you were referring to the parent
index argument :)
> + * unnecessary) for clocks with 0 or 1 parents as well as
> + * for clocks that can tolerate switching the rate and the parent
> + * separately via calls to .set_parent and .set_rate.
> + * Returns 0 on success, -EERROR otherwise.
> + *
> + *
> * The clk_enable/clk_disable and clk_prepare/clk_unprepare pairs allow
> * implementations to split any work between atomic (enable) and sleepable
> * (prepare) contexts. If enabling a clock requires code that might sleep,
Thanks
James
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list