[PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx
Tomasz Figa
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 18:06:07 EDT 2013
On Tuesday 06 of August 2013 12:47:51 Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2013-08-05 16:42:16)
>
> > On Monday 05 of August 2013 12:02:16 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-08-05 11:13:55)
> > >
> > > > On 08/06/13 03:06, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-08-05 10:01:36)
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 07/23/13 08:49, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > >>> This series is an attempt to move clock support on Samsung
> > > > >>> S3C64xx
> > > > >>> SoCs
> > > > >>> to Common Clock Framework.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> First, support for PLL types present on S3C64xx SoCs is added
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> Samsung Common Clock Framework driver. Then the main clock
> > > > >>> driver
> > > > >>> for mentioned SoCs is introduced. Further patches contain
> > > > >>> fixes
> > > > >>> for drivers to make them compliant with CCF semantics,
> > > > >>> migration
> > > > >>> of platform code to use the new clock driver and removal of
> > > > >>> old
> > > > >>> clock management code.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Depends on:
> > > > >>> - [PATCH v4 00/20] Samsung PWM support cleanup
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20
> > > > >>> 856
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On S3C6410-based Tiny6410 board (Mini6410-compatible):
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Tested-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa at gmail.com>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> For v1:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette at linaro.org>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Changes since v1:
> > > > >>> - added patch for read-only muxes,
> > > > >>> - exported configurable muxes and dividers,
> > > > >>> - defined mout_syncmux as read-only mux,
> > > > >>> - in DT-enabled case fixed-clock binding is used to define
> > > > >>> external clocks.> >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Tomasz Figa (8):
> > > > >>> clk: mux: Add support for read-only muxes.
> > > > >>> clk: samsung: pll: Add support for PLL6552 and PLL6553
> > > > >>> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for S3C64xx SoCs
> > > > >>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Add soc_is_s3c6400/s3c6410 macros
> > > > >>> ARM: s3c64xx: dma: Use
> > > > >>> clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
> > > > >>> usb: host: ohci-s3c2410 Use
> > > > >>> clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
> > > > >>> ARM: s3c64xx: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock
> > > > >>> Framework
> > > > >>> ARM: s3c64xx: Remove old clock management code
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.txt | 77
> > > > >>> ++
> > > > >>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1007
> > > > >>> -------------------- arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.c
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> | 21 +-
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.h | 12
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dma.c | 4
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 132
> > > > >>> +--
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c | 11
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6400.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 2
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c | 21 -
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6400.c | 6 -
> > > > >>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6410.c | 7 -
> > > > >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 4 +
> > > > >>> drivers/clk/clk-mux.c | 10
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 160
> > > > >>> ++++
> > > > >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 4 +
> > > > >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 465
> > > > >>> +++++++++
> > > > >>> drivers/usb/host/ohci-s3c2410.c | 8
> > > > >>> +-
> > > > >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.h | 178
> > > > >>> ++++
> > > > >>> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 2 +
> > > > >>> 28 files changed, 943 insertions(+), 1205 deletions(-)
> > > > >>> create mode 100644
> > > > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clo
> > > > >>> ck.
> > > > >>> txt delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c
> > > > >>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c
> > > > >>> create mode 100644
> > > > >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.h
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Basically, this series looks good to me, but I'm not sure how
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> should be handled because of dependency with PWM cleanup and
> > > > >> clk
> > > > >> stuff
> > > > >> in clk tree now...
> > > > >
> > > > > Patches 1-3 can go into the clk tree. 4-6 should go through
> > > > > their
> > > > > respective trees.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want I can take 7& 8 through the clk tree.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alternatively I can provide patches 1-3 in a separate stable
> > > > > topic
> > > > > branch for you to pull in as a dependency. We'll both merge that
> > > > > stable
> > > > > topic branch into our trees and you can make a note of it for
> > > > > the
> > > > > arm-soc folks.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your quick response. Would be helpful to samsung tree
> > > > if
> > > > you
> > > > could provide a separate stable topic branch what you suggested
> > > > for
> > > > clk
> > > > stuff in this series.
> > >
> > > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-next-s3c64xx
> > >
> > > Topic branch contains patches 1-3 of this series on top of
> > > v3.11-rc2. I
> > > have already merged the same into the clk-next branch.
> >
> > What about the dependency on PWM cleanup series? Patches 7-8 must be
> > merged after them, otherwise there will be a regression, because the
> > old PWM clocksource driver will be broken and so s3c64xx won't boot
> > until moved to new one, which is done by mentioned series.
>
> Is this a question for me? I did not take patches 7 or 8 into clk-next.
> Sounds like those patches should go through Samsung tree into arm-soc,
> and perhaps be a late-applied branch to get the ordering right.
It's just continuation of the topic. I guess the question is mostly for
Kukjin. Anyway, your suggestion is most likely the right thing, thanks.
Best regards,
Tomasz
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list