[PATCH] clk: samsung: add set_rate and round_rate callbacks for pll45xx

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Yadwinder Singh Brar (2013-07-11 22:48:55)
> Sorry I missed to state a point in earlier reply..,
> 
> 
> >>> +#define PLL45XX_PMS(f, p, m, s)              \
> >>> +     {                                       \
> >>> +             .target_freq    = f,            \
> >>> +             .pdiv           = p,            \
> >>> +             .mdiv           = m,            \
> >>> +             .sdiv           = s,            \
> >>> +     }
> >>> +
> >>>  enum pll46xx_type {
> >>>       pll_4600,
> >>>       pll_4650,
> >>
> >> Basically, I would prefer the way introduced by Yadwinder's and Vikas' patches
> >> to be used. We already discussed all the aspects during all the 7 versions of
> >> those patches and decided to go with that solution, so for the case of
> >> consistency, same should be used for remaining PLLs.
> >
> > Ok, but could we look at this once more. We could avoid duplication of
> > PLL tables if the lookup tables are kept generic. It would be nice to
> > get opinions from others as well on this.
> >
> 
> The rationale behind using common enum type was to use common(generic) set
> of clk ops where ever it is possible, to avoid duplication of most of
> the code(which
> looks mostly common with many PLLs).  For example its done for 35xx & 25xx
> and 36xx & 26xx PLLs in that series.

Was there ever a consensus reached on the pll45xx round_rate & set_rate
implementation?

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Regards,
> Yadwinder