[PATCH 3/8] clk: tegra114: add LP1 suspend/resume support

[Stephen Warren]

On 08/05/2013 02:02 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 04:32 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/02/2013 02:09 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 06:51 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> On 07/26/2013 03:15 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>> When the system suspends to LP1, the clock of the CPU would be switched to
>>>>> CLK_M (12MHz Oscillator) during suspend/resume flow. The clock driver
>>>>> needs to restore the clock of CPU after LP1 resume.
>>>>
>>>> It's unclear to me how the code change implements "restore the clock of
>>>> the CPU". A register name of CCLKG_BURST_POLICY doesn't sound like it's
>>>> anything to do with enabled/disabling the CPU clock, nor configuring its
>>>> rate. What exactly does this register do, and hence what does this new
>>>> code actually restore?
>>>>
>>> When system suspend to LP1, most of the PLLs was clock gated. Because we
>>> didn't cut off the core power, the settings of PLL still keep there. But
>>> we switch the clock source of CPU to CLK_M before shut off PLLs by
>>> CCLKG_BURSY_POLICY register. So we need to resume it back to original
>>> clock source by CCLKG_BURST_POLICY register. Or it would be keep in low
>>> rate (CLK_M) after resume.
>>
>> OK, I guess the register name was badly chosen by HW. I'd like to see
>> part of your description above in the patch description. How about
>> replacing the patch description with:
>>
>> ----------
>> When the system suspends to LP1, the CPU clock source is switched to
>> CLK_M (12MHz Oscillator) during suspend/resume flow[1]. The CPU clock
>> source is controlled by the CCLKG_BURST_POLICY register, and hence this
>> register must be restored during LP1 resume.
>> ----------
>>
>> [1] Question: where does this happen? This patch doesn't make that
>> change. I wonder why the suspend path can't save this register, rather
>> than implementing a separate suspend syscore op in the clock driver.
>> Does the HW auto-switch the value in the register itself?
>
> If we switch CPU to CLK_M in clock driver, the system will become slowly
> during the middle of suspending flow. We do this at the very end of the
> LP1 suspending flow before the CPU disable all the PLL clocks.

I think you answered "why is the switch to CLK_M performed very late",
whereas I asked "where is the code that performs the switch to CLK_M".

>>>> Why don't Tegra20/30 need a similar change?
>>>
>>> For Tegra20/30, the same code had been implemented in the suspend/resume
>>> function of tegra_cpu_car_ops. It restores the CPU clock ASAP when CPU
>>> resume from a suspend state to get quick performance I believe.
>>>
>>> For Tegra114, the resume performance is cool (although we can't see it
>>> in upstream kernel now, it still need some other functions.). We can
>>> implement all the clock related suspend/resume function in the clock
>>> driver.
>>
>> OK, I do see something similar in tegra20/30_cpu_clock_suspend/resume.
>> Why can't this new code be part of the equivalent functions; does the
>> Tegra114 suspend/resume code in mach-tegra/ not call
>> tegra_cpu_car_ops.suspend/resume() in the same way it does on Tegra20/30?
>
> One of the main reasons is due to DFLL clock. The CPU clock of Tegra114
> is going to switch to DFLL to a get higher clock rate. But it depends
> some other HW (i.e. I2C), we can't resume it so early when the CPU just
> resume like we did in tegra_cpu_car_ops.suspend/resume for Tegra20/30.

Is there a guarantee that the syscore_ops are run after the call to
tegar_cpu_car_ops.resume() would be? Perhaps the mach-tegra/ code should
simply call tegra_cpu_car_ops.resume() later on Tegra114 than it does on
earlier chips, so it's run at a suitable time?