[FAILURE] omap4430-sdp allnoconfig

[Olof Johansson]

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 08/01, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 11:59:56AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > On 08/01, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> > > This one looks fine for me. Can you send above in
>> > > a proper patch ? Let me know if you want me to
>> > > send it.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Here's a proper patch. Olof, can you please apply this on top of
>> > the merge (and maybe you can fix the merge again to handle the
>> > HAVE_CAN problem I mentioned earlier).
>> >
>> > ---8<---
>> > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix fallout from localtimer divorce and SMP=n
>> >
>> > A recent patch ef3160c (ARM: OMAP2+: Divorce from local timer
>> > API, 2013-03-04) broke the omap build when SMP=n because the TWD
>> > functions are only compiled on SMP=y builds. Stub out the TWD
>> > calls when the TWD isn't built in to to keep everything building.
>> >
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function
>> > `omap4_local_timer_init':
>> > dss-common.c:(.init.text+0x1d90): undefined reference to
>> > `twd_local_timer_register'
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
>> > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Thanks, applied (with the reported-by changed as requested)
>>
>
> It looks like somehow you became the author. Is there anyway you
> can fix that and possibly fix the merge before it to not add
> HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN if CAN in mach-imx/Kconfig?

That's because the patch wasn't sent such that it could be applied
with git am, and forgot to set authorship back. Fixed now.


-Olof