[Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ARM ATTEND] Describing complex, non-probable system topologies
Greg KH
greg at kroah.com
Thu Aug 1 16:36:31 EDT 2013
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 09:18:23PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:15:39AM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I'm not saying move away from DT at all, if it can be used to describe
> > stuff like this, wonderful. Just please don't use platform_bus anymore
> > than you have to.
>
> As far as that sentiment goes, it would have been nice if that was made
> more vocally ten years ago, because at that time I was the one trying to
> encourage people to think about creating appropriate bus types, and what
> I was being told was that no, bus types are something which are deprecated
> and platform bus is what should be used.
Was that me that said that? I don't recall it at all, and if I did, I
was flat out wrong. I've always said that platform_bus is a hack, and
should only be used as a "last resort". Others have grabbed onto it as
the "only" way to do devices for embedded things because that is what
they were used to.
sorry,
greg k-h
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list