Need help to measure and tune the latency in Linux RT
Ashoka K
ashok.vinu at gmail.com
Tue Apr 30 09:17:05 EDT 2013
Thanks for all the replies.
I am stuck with this issue for more tan a month. Explained this in
more detail at:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15805231/need-to-improve-the-linux-performance-for-embedded-system
But with no response from anyone.
I use PREEMPT patch for 2.6.33 vanilla kernel.
I have pasted all the processes running on my system:
PID USER VSZ STAT COMMAND
1 root 3192 S init
2 root 0 SW [kthreadd]
3 root 0 SW [ksoftirqd/0]
4 root 0 SW [events/0]
5 root 0 SW [khelper]
8 root 0 SW [async/mgr]
84 root 0 SW [sync_supers]
86 root 0 SW [bdi-default]
88 root 0 SW [kblockd/0]
91 root 0 SW [omap2_mcspi]
116 root 0 SW [rpciod/0]
123 root 0 SW [kswapd0]
124 root 0 SW [aio/0]
125 root 0 SW [nfsiod]
126 root 0 SW< [kslowd001]
127 root 0 SW< [kslowd000]
128 root 0 SW [crypto/0]
267 root 0 SW [mtdblockd]
351 root 0 SWN [jffs2_gcd_mtd8]
359 root 3192 S /sbin/syslogd
361 root 3192 S /usr/sbin/telnetd
364 root 1996 S vsftpd
410 root 43844 S my_appl
416 root 56412 S < my_appl
417 root 84804 S my_appl
418 root 43844 S my_appl
419 root 84824 S my_appl
430 root 46552 S < my_appl
The process my_appl is my application processes.
the ksoftirq is running with SCHED_OTHER.
$ chrt -p 3
pid 3's current scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER
pid 3's current scheduling priority: 0
I will test by changing ksoftirq priority to see how it works.
Regards
Ashoka. K
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Stanislav Meduna <stano at meduna.org> wrote:
>>> This critical thread is at RR priority 50.
>
> Try to put it higher than the irq thread handling your HD hardware.
> I've even encountered hardware where I had to put the ATA thread
> in the SHED_OTHER domain - see [1] for the thread.
>
>>> I used a HR timer thread with RR pri 55 to wakeup the critical thread
>>> every 1 milli sec to do the job.
>
> Which prio is the ksoftirqd running at? The HRTIMER interrupts are
> routed through it so it also has to be high enough.
>
> I got burned with this myself [2]
>
> Regards
> Stano
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg08711.html
> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg08745.html
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list