[PATCH] gpio/omap: ensure gpio context is initialised

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Friday 19 April 2013 06:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 04/18/2013 07:34 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 04/18/2013 06:10 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 04/18/2013 04:34 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> Why not just init context right here if bank->loses_context &&
>>>> !bank->context_valid?
>>
>> I really like this idea a lot. It can really clean-up the code
>> and really make it much more readable. Before we were playing 
>> some tricks with when we init'ed the get_context_loss_count()
>> function pointer. How about the below?
>>
>> Tony, care to re-test?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jon
>>
>> From d7a940531d354e6be5e16ee50fa8344041df963a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
>> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:06:54 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] gpio/omap: ensure gpio context is initialised
>>
>> Commit a2797be (gpio/omap: force restore if context loss is not
>> detectable) broke gpio support for OMAP when booting with device-tree
>> because a restore of the gpio context being performed without ever
>> initialising the gpio context. In other words, the context restored was
>> bad.
>>
>> This problem could also occur in the non device-tree case, however, it
>> is much less likely because when booting without device-tree we can
>> detect context loss via a platform specific API and so context restore
>> is performed less often.
>>
>> Nevertheless we should ensure that the gpio context is initialised
>> on the first pm-runtime resume for gpio banks that could lose their
>> state regardless of whether we are booting with device-tree or not.
>>
>> The context loss count was being initialised on the first pm-runtime
>> suspend following a resume, by populating the get_count_loss_count()
>> function pointer after the first pm-runtime resume. To make the code
>> more readable and logical, initialise the context loss count on the
>> first pm-runtime resume if the context is not yet valid.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> index 0557529..db3c732 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>>  	bool is_mpuio;
>>  	bool dbck_flag;
>>  	bool loses_context;
>> +	bool context_valid;
>>  	int stride;
>>  	u32 width;
>>  	int context_loss_count;
>> @@ -1129,6 +1130,7 @@ static int omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  			bank->loses_context = true;
>>  	} else {
>>  		bank->loses_context = pdata->loses_context;
>> +		bank->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
> 
> Still need to check loses_context for populating
> get_context_loss_count here. Updated patch below.
> 
> Jon
> 
> From d02ef7b7dfcf8e13bf019aedfdecb38ca3c6749f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:06:54 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio/omap: ensure gpio context is initialised
> 
> Commit a2797be (gpio/omap: force restore if context loss is not
> detectable) broke gpio support for OMAP when booting with device-tree
> because a restore of the gpio context being performed without ever
> initialising the gpio context. In other words, the context restored was
> bad.
> 
> This problem could also occur in the non device-tree case, however, it
> is much less likely because when booting without device-tree we can
> detect context loss via a platform specific API and so context restore
> is performed less often.
> 
> Nevertheless we should ensure that the gpio context is initialised
> on the first pm-runtime resume for gpio banks that could lose their
> state regardless of whether we are booting with device-tree or not.
> 
> The context loss count was being initialised on the first pm-runtime
> suspend following a resume, by populating the get_count_loss_count()
> function pointer after the first pm-runtime resume. To make the code
> more readable and logical, initialise the context loss count on the
> first pm-runtime resume if the context is not yet valid.
> 
> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
> ---
This version looks better than the first one for sure. I am still not
happy with per bank "context_valid" flag whose job just ends after
the probe. But then I do agree with you about the global flag might
be fragile and less maintainable.

So, FWIW,
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>