[PATCH 18/19] ARM: at91: suspend both memory controllers on at91sam9263

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 04/18/2013 04:19 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 04:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann :
>> On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>
>>>> This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the
>>>> at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which
>>>> may or may not be the right solution. If it is not,
>>>> maybe someone could provide a better fix.
>>>
>>> Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix
>>> with proper RAM type.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>>>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
>>>
>>> What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this
>>> patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc
>>> tree?
>>
>> I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree.
>>
>> Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now.
>>
>>>> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
>>>> Cc: Andrew Victor <linux at maxim.org.za>
>>>> Cc: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre at free-electrons.com>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to
>>> move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each
>>> other?
>>
>> Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on
>> top of his other patches?
> 
> Well, as Daniel's patches are still under construction, I stack this one
> on the at91-3.10-soc branch and let Daniel rebase his work on top of a
> 3.10-rc1-ish tree...

No problem.

Thanks
  -- Daniel


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog