linux-next: useless merges
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Wed Apr 17 19:47:19 EDT 2013
Yeah, that's my fault. I rebuilt one of the branches and merged in the
new version which ended up being a NULL operation.
It'll go away when we rebuild for-next (we don't send our aggregated
for-next branch to Linus, just the individual branches that are part
of it).
-Olof
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The only change in the arm-soc tree since yesterday (3035229f89dc), is to
> merge a merge that just merges two branches that were already merged into
> arm-soc some time ago!
>
> Please be a bit more careful, this just complicates the tree for no
> reason.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list