[PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix race condition in atc_advance_work()
Vinod Koul
vinod.koul at intel.com
Tue Apr 16 09:15:19 EDT 2013
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:49:34PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches at atmel.com>
>
> The BUG_ON() directive is triggered probably due to a latency modification
> following inclusion of c10d736 (softirq: reduce latencies).
> This condition has not been met before 3.9-rc1 and doesn't trigger without
> this patch.
>
> We now make sure that DMA channel is idle before calling atc_complete_all()
> which makes the BUG_ON() "protection" useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches at atmel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>
> ---
> Linus,
>
> We have identified a race condition on the Atmel ARM-based AT91 DMA controller
> driver that leads to hitting a BUG_ON() directive.
> This error, only triggered after the inclusion of a patch that reduces the
> softirq latency, is affecting several AT91 SoCs and can be seen
> as a regression by people using the dmaengine driver (on NAND flash
> accesses for instance).
>
> I know that it is late in the development cycle but can you please consider
> including it in your tree before 3.9-final?
>
> This patch can also go through dmaengine tree (Vinod Koul) but I do not know if
> there is enough time remaining.
>
> Thanks a lot, best regards,
>
> Nicolas Ferre
>
>
> drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
> index 6e13f26..88cfc61 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
> @@ -310,8 +310,6 @@ static void atc_complete_all(struct at_dma_chan *atchan)
>
> dev_vdbg(chan2dev(&atchan->chan_common), "complete all\n");
>
> - BUG_ON(atc_chan_is_enabled(atchan));
> -
> /*
> * Submit queued descriptors ASAP, i.e. before we go through
> * the completed ones.
> @@ -368,6 +366,9 @@ static void atc_advance_work(struct at_dma_chan *atchan)
> {
> dev_vdbg(chan2dev(&atchan->chan_common), "advance_work\n");
>
> + if (atc_chan_is_enabled(atchan))
> + return;
> +
> if (list_empty(&atchan->active_list) ||
> list_is_singular(&atchan->active_list)) {
> atc_complete_all(atchan);
> @@ -1078,9 +1079,7 @@ static void atc_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
> return;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&atchan->lock, flags);
> - if (!atc_chan_is_enabled(atchan)) {
> - atc_advance_work(atchan);
> - }
> + atc_advance_work(atchan);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&atchan->lock, flags);
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list