[PATCH 2/3] clk: composite: allow fixed rates & fixed dividers
Mike Turquette
mturquette at linaro.org
Thu Apr 11 13:56:13 EDT 2013
Quoting Prashant Gaikwad (2013-04-11 04:47:50)
> On Thursday 11 April 2013 03:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > The composite clock assumes that any clock implementing the .recalc_rate
> > callback will also implement .round_rate and .set_rate. This is not
> > always true; the basic fixed-rate clock will only implement .recalc_rate
> > and a fixed-divider clock may choose to implement .recalc_rate and
> > .round_rate but not .set_rate.
> >
> > Fix this by conditionally registering .round_rate and .set_rate
> > callbacks based on the rate_ops passed in to clk_composite_register.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad at nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Emilio López <emilio at elopez.com.ar>
> > Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> > index 6f4728c..2779fb3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> > @@ -150,17 +150,22 @@ struct clk *clk_register_composite(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> > }
> >
> > if (rate_hw && rate_ops) {
> > - if (!rate_ops->recalc_rate || !rate_ops->round_rate ||
> > - !rate_ops->set_rate) {
> > + if (!rate_ops->recalc_rate) {
> > clk = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > + /* .round_rate is a prerequisite for .set_rate */
> > + if (rate_ops->round_rate) {
> > + clk_composite_ops->round_rate = clk_composite_round_rate;
> > + if (rate_ops->set_rate) {
> > + clk_composite_ops->set_rate = clk_composite_set_rate;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
>
> What if rate_ops has only recalc_rate and set_rate? clk_composite_ops
> will have only recalc_rate and it will pass the sanity check in clk_init
> and caller of clk_register_composite will expect set_rate to work.
> We should check here if rate_ops has set_rate but not round_rate then
> return error.
>
I think I will instead put a WARN here instead of completely bailing out
of the clock registration.
Thanks,
Mike
> > composite->rate_hw = rate_hw;
> > composite->rate_ops = rate_ops;
> > clk_composite_ops->recalc_rate = clk_composite_recalc_rate;
> > - clk_composite_ops->round_rate = clk_composite_round_rate;
> > - clk_composite_ops->set_rate = clk_composite_set_rate;
> > }
> >
> > if (gate_hw && gate_ops) {
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list