[PATCH v3 10/32] arm64: KVM: system register handling

Will Deacon will.deacon at arm.com
Wed Apr 10 13:04:35 EDT 2013


On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:17:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9df3b32
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,871 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2012,2013 - ARM Ltd
> + * Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> + *
> + * Derived from arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c:
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 - Virtual Open Systems and Columbia University
> + * Authors: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
> + *          Christoffer Dall <c.dall at virtualopensystems.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_coproc.h>
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +#include <asm/cputype.h>
> +#include <trace/events/kvm.h>
> +
> +#include "sys_regs.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * All of this file is extremly similar to the ARM coproc.c, but the
> + * types are different. My gut feeling is that it should be pretty
> + * easy to merge, but that would be an ABI breakage -- again. VFP
> + * would also need to be abstracted.
> + */

Yes, there's a lot of duplication here.

> +/* 3 bits per cache level, as per CLIDR, but non-existent caches always 0 */
> +static u32 cache_levels;
> +
> +/* CSSELR values; used to index KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_CCSIDR */
> +#define CSSELR_MAX 12
> +
> +/* Which cache CCSIDR represents depends on CSSELR value. */
> +static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
> +{
> +       u32 ccsidr;
> +
> +       /* Make sure noone else changes CSSELR during this! */
> +       local_irq_disable();
> +       /* Put value into CSSELR */
> +       asm volatile("msr csselr_el1, %x0" : : "r" (csselr));
> +       /* Read result out of CCSIDR */
> +       asm volatile("mrs %0, ccsidr_el1" : "=r" (ccsidr));
> +       local_irq_enable();

Case in point: you're missing an isb here, which I remember pointing out
when Christoffer made the same mistake...

> +       return ccsidr;
> +}
> +
> +static void do_dc_cisw(u32 val)
> +{
> +       asm volatile("dc cisw, %x0" : : "r" (val));
> +}
> +
> +static void do_dc_csw(u32 val)
> +{
> +       asm volatile("dc csw, %x0" : : "r" (val));
> +}

You don't have any barriers here. Whilst you could expect the guest to take
care of barriers, I don't think that works if you are preempted and handle
this on a different core.

> +/* See note at ARM ARM B1.14.4 */
> +static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +                       const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +                       const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +       unsigned long val;
> +       int cpu;
> +
> +       cpu = get_cpu();
> +
> +       if (!p->is_write)
> +               return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p);

Missing put_cpu().

Will



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list